Lego
(Stranger)
03-29-03 00:39
No 422100
      Optical Resolution of Meth by Distillation
(Rated as: excellent)
    

Solvent-Free Optical Resolution of
N-methylamphetamine by Distillation
After Partial Diastereoisomeric Salt Formation


Chirality 13:428430, 2001


ABSTRACT Solvent-free optical resolution of N-methylamphetamine was developed by distillation after partial diastereoisomeric salt formation.


Optical resolutions via diastereoisomeric salt formation are usually based on the separation of diastereoisomers by fractional crystallization.1 The accomplishment of the fractional crystallization is usually very laborious; in most cases several recrystallization steps are required to obtain the pure diastereoisomers. Optical resolutions with 510 recrystallizations are common,2 but, for example, in the case of the resolution of racemic a-chlorobutyric acid by cinchonidine the precipitated salt was recrystallized 159 times.2 Optical resolutions with several recrystallization steps cannot be scaled up economically into industrial scale, since they require large amounts of solvents, highvolume vessels, and much time. Our research group is looking for new resolution methodologies which can be more easily applied at the industrial scale.36 In this article, we report the application of a newly developed, solvent-free resolution method. An industrially important compound, the N-methylamphetamine (MA, Fig. 1), a key intermediate of some chiral drugs, for example, the antiparkinson agent Jumext, served as the model compound for the investigations.

For optical resolutions without solvent the application of nonstoichiometric amounts of resolving agent seemed to be suitable. Since the MA is an easily distillable liquid and its salts are usually solid, we expected enantiomer separation by the Marckwald method, by applying half an equivalent of resolving agent. The experiments were performed in a way which makes resolution as simple as possible: the liquid base was layered onto the solid resolving agent and after standing at room temperature the unreacted base was distilled off. The MA enantiomer which formed the more stable salt with the resolving agent remained in the residue, while the other MA enantiomer distilled (Fig. 1).

The tartaric acid 1 and its two O-acyl derivatives (O,O-dibenzoyl (2) and O,O8-di-p-toluyl (3)) are equally good, highly effective resolving agents of MA through resolution by fractional crystallization.8 Since tartaric acids have two carboxylic groups they can form either acidic or neutral salt with an amine. Tartaric acid forms a hydrogen tartrate with MA during fractional crystallizations, but with its two O-acyl derivatives neutral salts are formed. The 2:1 molar ratio corresponds to the hydrogen tartrate formation, while the 4:1 to the neutral tartrate formation, leaving half of the amine unreacted. In addition to the 2:1 and 4:1 molar ratios, the 1:1 and 3:1 ratios were also tested with the three tartaric acids.

With the 1:1 molar ratio there was distillate only in the case of tartaric acid, which indicates that with this acid there was no real salt formation. With the two O-acyl derivatives the lack of distillate proved the salt formation. The distillation experiments from the tartaric acid with 2:1 and 4:1 molar ratios resulted in larger amounts of distillate than could be expected from normal salt formation and the distillate showed no sign of optical activity, proving that under the applied conditions tartaric acid forms no salts with the MA, and without salt formation no resolution can be expected.

In contrast to the tartaric acid, its two O-acyl derivatives 2 and 3 provide optical resolution. By using the two O-acyl tartaric acids in 2:1 molar ratio, about 70% optical purity can be achieved in the distillate with about 50% yield, which means that in the residue the neutral and acidic salts should be in about the same quantity. By changing the molar ratio to 3:1, the stoichiometry of the residue does not change, while the amount of the distillate doubles, which is accompanied only by a slight decrease in optical purity. It is interesting that a further decrease in the ratio of base:acid to 4:1 does not increase, but slightly decreases the amount of the distillate (the unbound amine); the optical purity of the distillate is between the optical purity achieved by 2:1 and 3:1 ratios. The amount of the base in the residue is higher than should be expected, even assuming complete formation of neutral salt, which means that the neutral salt bonds some MA by complex formation too.

It seems that the chiral recognition is better in case 2 than 3, indicated by the fact that under the same conditions and yield, 2 produces distillates with higher optical purity than 3.

During the experiments 2 was used in its monohydrate form. We found that when it is applied in water-free form the optical purity of the distillate is close to 80% (Table 1, row 8), probably because the MA did not have to compete for the binding site with the water. The efficiency of the resolution is 0.74, which is in the range of industrial-scale resolutions, and not worse than the efficiency which can be achieved by optical resolution of MA by fractional crystallization.

The optical purity of the MA can be further increased by repetition of the process. For example, the redistillation of a base of 59% optical purity from 2 results in 94% optical purity MA.

Fifteen further chiral acids were tested as resolving agents for the MA by distillation with 2:1 base:acid molar ratio (Table 1, Fig. 2). Three of them were dicarboxylic acids. Aspartic acid (4) and glutamic acid (6) did not form salt with MA, nearly all the MA distilled in racemic form.

The N-formyl-aspartic acid (5) formed salt; according to the material balance the residue is a mixture of the neutral and acidic salt, but there is no optical activity in the distillate.

In the case of the 12 monocarboxylic acids the amount of distillate in most cases was less than half of all the base, which means that partial complex formation also took place, together with salt formation.

Optical resolution was achieved only in the case of three monocarboxylic acids, 7, 14, and 18. The yields were quite good but the optical purities were rather low. It is interesting that trans-permetrinic acid (14) was able to perform resolution while its cis-isomer (13) was not. There was no enantiomer separation with 9, which is a derivative of the efficient 2.



TABLE 1. Summary of the experimental results
Acid Molar ratio b:a Amount of acid g Distillate Yield g Y %1 [a]D 20 (c = 1, 1 N HCl) OP % S9
1. 2R,3R-1 1:1 3.00 1.2 80.5 0.0 0 0.0
2. 2R,3R-1 2:1 1.50 1.9 127.5 0.0 0 0.0
3. 2R,3R-1 4:1 0.75 2.1 142.0 0.0 0 0.0
4. 2R,3R-2 1:1 7.53 0.0
5. 2R,3R-2 2:1 3.76 0.6 40.3 +13.6 72 0.29
6. 2R,3R-2 3:1 2.51 1.3 87.3 +11.2 59 0.51
7. 2R,3R-2 4:1 1.88 1.2 80.5 +12.8 68 0.54
8. 2R,3R-22 4:1 1.88 1.4 94.0 +14.8 78 0.74
9. 2R,3R-3 1:1 7.73 0.0
10. 2R,3R-3 2:1 3.86 0.7 47.0 +12.9 68 0.32
11. 2R,3R-3 3:1 2.58 1.3 87.3 +9.5 50 0.44
12. 2R,3R-3 4:1 1.93 1.2 80.5 +11.1 59 0.47
13. L-4 2:1 1.33 2.7 181.2 0.0 0 0.0
14. L-5 2:1 1.61 0.9 60.0 0.0 0 0.0
15. L-6 2:1 1.47 2.6 174.4 0.0 0 0.0
16. (+)-7 2:1 2.30 1.3 87.3 -1.5 8 0.07
17. S-8 2:1 1.52 0.7 47.0 0.0 0 0.0
18. R,R-9 2:1 3.89 1.0 67.1 0.0 0 0.0
19. 2R,3R-10 2:1 3.27 1.1 73.8 0.0 0 0.0
20. R-11 2:1 2.21 1.1 73.8 0.0 0 0.0
21. R-12 2:1 2.19 1.1 73.8 0.0 0 0.0
22. R-13 2:1 2.09 0.8 53.7 0.0 0 0.0
23. S-14 2:1 2.09 1.1 73.8 +2.9 15 0.11
24. L-15 2:1 0.90 1.2 80.5 0.0 0 0.0
25. 1S-16 2:1 2.32 0.9 60.4 0.0 0 0.0
26. L-17 2:1 1.76 0.9 60.4 0.0 0 0.0
27. D-(+)-18 2:1 1.66 1.4 94.0 -2.0 11 0.10


CONCLUSIONS
Our experiments proved that optical resolution by distillation after partial salt formation without the use of any solvent can be as effective as the conventional resolutions by fractional crystallization. Omitting the solvent eliminates several difficulties of resolutions via fractional crystallizations. The process can be scaled up at reduced cost since it is simpler, faster, and requires smaller volume. In addition, the environmental problems caused by the used solvents are eliminated.


EXPERIMENTAL
All chemicals were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
General procedure for the resolution experiments: 3 g (0.02 mol) MA was layered onto the calculated amount of resolving agent (Table 1, 4th column). After 1 h of standing at room temperature the mixture was subjected to distillation at reduced pressure to remove the free base (T = 30C, p = 0.1 mmHg). The distillate was directed into a dry-ice/aceton-cooled trap. The optical purity of the distillate was determined by specific rotation measurements by a Perkin Elmer 241 polarimeter. The specific rotation of the optically pure (R)-N-methylamphetamine is [a]D 20 = -18.90 (c = 1; 1 N HCl). The experimental results are summarized in Table 1.



LITERATURE CITED
1. Newman P. Optical resolution procedures for chemical compounds, vols. 13. New York: Optical Resolution Information Center, Manhattan College; 197884.
2. Jacques J, Collet A, Wilen SH. Enantiomers, racemates and resolutions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
3. Acs M, Bussche Ch, Seebach D. An efficient method of preparing (R)- and (S)-4,4,4-trifluoro-3-hydroxybutanoic acid: resolution with (R)- or
(S)-1-phenylethylamine. Chimica 1990;44:9092.
4. Acs M, Kozma D, Fogassy E. Enantiomer separation via diastereoisomeric salt formation by liquid-liquid phase transition. ACH Models Chem 1995;132:475479.
5. Fogassy E, Acs M, Szili T, Simandi B, Sawinsky J. Molecular chiral recognition in supercritical solvents. Tetrahedron Lett 1994;35:257260.
6. Acs M, Szili T, Fogassy E. New method of optical activation for racemic bases. Tetrahedron Lett 1991;32:73257328.
7. Fogassy E. Acs M, Faigl F, Simon K, Rohonczy J, Ecsery Z. Pseudosymmetry and chiral discrimination in optical resolution via diastereoisomeric salt formation. The crystal structures of (R)- and (S)-Nmethylamphetamine bitartarates (RMERTA and SMERTA). J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 1986;18811886.
8. Kozma D, Madarasz Z, A cs M, Fogassy E. Study of mechanism of an optical resolutions via diastereoisomeric salt formation by Pope-Peachy method. Tetrahedron Asym 1994;5:193.
9. The efficiency (0 < S < 1) of the optical resolution has been defined as the product of the optical purity (0 < OP < 1) and the yield (0 < Y < 1) of the precipitated salt: S = OPxY. Fogassy E, Lopata A, Faigl F, Darvas F, A cs M, Toke L. A quantitative approach to optical resolution. Tetrahedron Lett 1980;21:647650.

The candle that burns twice as bright burns half as long
 
 
 
 
    Lego
(Hive Bee)
06-18-04 15:43
No 514122
      Resolution of meth by supercritical extraction
(Rated as: good read)
    

Resolution of N-methylamphetamine enantiomers with tartaric acid derivatives by supercritical fluid extraction
Ildiko Kmecz, Bela Simandi, Edit Szekely and Elemer Fogassy
Tet. Asy., 2004, 15(12), 1841-1845


Abstract: The resolution of N-methylamphetamine (MA) was carried out with the resolution agents O,O'-dibenzoyl-(2R,3R)-tartaric acid monohydrate (DBTA) and O,O'-di-p-toluoyl-(2R,3R)-tartaric acid (DPTTA). After partial diastereomeric salt formation, the unreacted enantiomers were extracted by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). The effects of resolution agent molar ratio to the racemic mixture (mr), extraction pressure (P) and temperature (T ) on the resolution efficiency were studied. The best chiral separation was obtained at a quarter of an equivalent resolution agent molar ratio for both resolution agents. Extraction conditions [pressure (100200 bar), temperature (3363 C)] did not influence the resolution efficiency, which makes the enantiomer separation robust. In one extraction step, both enantiomers can be produced with high enantiomeric excess (ee) and remarkable yield (Y ). Using DBTA as a resolution agent eeE = 83%, YE = 45% for the extract and eeR = 82%, YR = 42% for the raffinate were obtained.

[...]

4. Experimental
4.1. Materials

Racemic N-methylamphetamine was prepared by Chinoin Pharmaceutical Ltd (Budapest). Resolution agents (O,O'-dibenzoyl-(2R,3R)-tartaric acid monohydrate = DBTA, O,O'-di-p-toluoyl-(2R,3R)-tartaric acid = DPTTA) were purchased from Merck Ltd (Budapest).
Other analytical grade reagents were obtained from Reanal Ltd (Budapest).The used CO2 was 99.5% (w/w) pure and supplied by Messer Griesheim Hungaria Ltd, (Budapest).

4.2. General methods
Enantiomeric excess values of the samples were determined by optical rotatory measurements by Perkin Elmer 241 polarimeter according to prior calibration.
The specific rotation of the optically pure (R)-N-methylamphetamine was alphaD20 = -18.9 (c 0.1, 1M HCl).19

4.3. Resolution of N-methylamphetamine with O,O'-di-ptoluoyl-(2R,3R)-tartaric acid (DPTTA)
rac-MA (1.50 g, 10.1 mmol) and 0.97 g (2.52 mmol) DPTTA (mr = 0.25) were dissolved in 40 mL methanol after which 2.0 g Perfil 100TM was added to the solution. The solvent was evaporated in vacuum (T = 40 C, P = 20 kPa) and the sample dried at room temperature for 1 h. The solid sample was put into the extractor vessel and extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide at 150 bar 48 C. The extract was then collected in the separator {(S)-(+)-MA, 0.72 g, YE = 48.0%, alphaD20 = +13.1 (c 0.1, 1M HCl), eeE = 69%}.
The raffinate was suspended in 15 mL 2M NaOH and 20 mL CH2Cl2 and stirred for 5 min. After filtering the support, the organic and aqueous phases were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with 2 x 20 mL CH2Cl2. The collected organic phases were washed with 10 mL water and dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated in vacuum to give {(R)-(-)-MA, 0.58 g, YR = 38.8%, alphaD20 = -14.0 (c 0.1, 1M HCl), eeR = 74%}.

4.4. Resolution of N-methylamphetamine with O,O'-dibenzoyl-(2R,3R)-tartaric acid (DBTA)
rac-MA (1.50 g, 10.1 mmol) and 0.94 g (2.52 mmol) DBTA were dissolved in 40 mL methanol and 2.0 g Perfil 100TM then added to the solution. The solvent was evaporated in vacuum (T = 40 C, P = 20 kPa) and the sample dried at room temperature for 1 h. The solid sample was transferred into the extractor vessel and extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide at 150 bar 48 C. The extract was collected in the separator {(S)-(+)-MA, 0.68 g, YE = 45.3%, alphaD20 = +16.3 (c 0.1, 1M HCl), eeE = 86%}.
The raffinate was suspended in 15 mL 2M NaOH and 20 mL CH2Cl2 and stirred for 5 min. After filtering the support, the organic and aqueous phases were separated.  The aqueous phase was extracted with 2 x 20 mL CH2Cl2. The collected organic phase was washed with 10 mL water and dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated in vacuum to give {(R)-(-)-MA, 0.63 g, YR = 41.9%, alphaD20 = -15.6 (c 0.1, 1M HCl), eeR = 82%}.

[...]

References
[...]
19. Kozma, D.; Madarasz, Z.; Acs, M.; Fogassy, E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 193-194

The tendency is to push it as far as you can